Preprint -- The Primacy of Theoretical Foundations: Why Textbooks and Monographs Matter more than Journal Literature in Scientific Progress
Preprint
Liu, Yue, The Primacy of Theoretical Foundations: Why Textbooks and Monographs Matter more than Journal Literature in Scientific Progress (September 09, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5465615 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5465615
Liu, Yue and Liu, Ying and Drew, Michael G. B., The Fundamental Distinction Between Films and Materials: How Conceptual Confusion Led to Theoretical Errors in Microwave Absorption (September 17, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5498078 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5498078
Liu, Yue, The Primacy of Theoretical Foundations: Why Textbooks and Monographs Matter more than Journal Literature in Scientific Progress (September 09, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5465615 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5465615
Liu, Yue, The Theoretical Poverty of Modern Academia: Evidence of Widespread Intellectual Decline in Contemporary Scientific Research (September 05, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5463155 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5463155
Liu, Yue, The Inevitability and Necessity of Error in Scientific Publishing: Why Publishing Incorrect Articles Is Not Catastrophic (September 15, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5491906 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5491906
Liu, Yue, The Right to Academic Freedom: Why Scholarly Articles Should Not Require Citations and the Critique of the Academic Gaming System (September 06, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5452134 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5452134
Liu, Yue, The Academic Publishing Mythology: When Quality Control Becomes Quality Obstruction (September 12, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5478626 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5478626
Liu, Yue, Conflict of Interest in Academic Publishing: A Question of Accountability in the Pursuit of Truth (September 11, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5470606 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5470606
Liu, Yue and Liu, Ying, Redefining Review Articles: Beyond Balance Toward Theoretical Innovation (September 01, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5434337 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5434337, Liu, Yue, Redefining Review Articles: Beyond Balance Toward Theoretical Innovation, Sep 01, 2025, yueliusd.substack.com
Liu, Yue, The Philosophical Battle Between Dialectical Materialism and Idealistic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Analysis Through the Lens of Scientific Method (September 05, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5447975 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5447975
Liu, Yue and Liu, Ying, The Illusion of Quality Control: How Peer Review Enables Mediocrity While Suppressing Innovation in Academic Publishing (September 03, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5436920 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5436920, Liu, Yue and Liu, Ying, The Illusion of Quality Control: How Peer Review Enables Mediocrity While Suppressing Innovation in Academic Publishing, Sep 03, 2025, yueliusd.substack.com
Liu, Yue, Wu Wei Governance: A Philosophical Framework for Addressing the Academic Research Crisis and Institutional Gatekeeping (August 30, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5421094 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5421094, Liu, Yue, Wu Wei Governance: A Philosophical Framework for Addressing the Academic Research Crisis and Institutional Gatekeeping, 2025, yueliusd.substack.com
Liu, Yue, The Persistence of Intellectual Resistance: From Copernicus to Contemporary Science (August 20, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5399455 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5399455
Liu, Yue, Self-Citation Versus External Citation in Academic Publishing: A Critical Analysis of Citation Reliability, Publication Biases, And Scientific Quality Assessment (August 14, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5392646 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5392646
Liu, Yue, Theoretical Primacy in Scientific Inquiry: A Critique of the Empirical Orthodoxy in Modern Research (August 05, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5379953 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5379953
Liu, Yue, The Misapplication of Statistical Methods in Liberal Arts: A Critical Analysis of Academic Publishing Bias Against Theoretical Research (August 01, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5376778 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5376778
Excerpts
Contemporary academic culture has systematically devalued theoretical literacy in favor of experimental productivity, creating a crisis in scientific understanding that manifests as theoretical illiteracy among researchers, stagnation in fundamental scientific progress, and degradation of academic publishing quality.
Liu, Yue, The Theoretical Poverty of Modern Academia: Evidence of Widespread Intellectual Decline in Contemporary Scientific Research (September 05, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5463155 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5463155
This paper argues that reading textbooks and monographs is fundamentally more important than consuming journal literature for developing genuine scientific understanding. Modern scholars, driven by publication metrics and career advancement pressures, prioritize high-impact journal publications over deep theoretical comprehension, transforming themselves into "publication machines" rather than genuine scientists. Through analysis of current publishing practices, educational degradation, and theoretical stagnation, we demonstrate that the contemporary emphasis on journal literature represents a regression toward pre-scientific methodologies reminiscent of alchemy. The restoration of theoretical literacy through comprehensive study of foundational texts is essential for reversing the current crisis in scientific progress and academic integrity.
The contemporary scientific establishment has engineered a profound inversion of intellectual priorities, systematically privileging the consumption of journal articles over the comprehensive study of theoretical foundations presented in textbooks and monographs. This misplaced emphasis reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how scientific knowledge is properly acquired and developed. While journal articles report incremental findings within existing theoretical frameworks, textbooks and monographs provide the comprehensive theoretical understanding necessary for genuine scientific innovation.
Modern researchers, driven by career pressures and publication metrics, have become what can only be characterized as "academic publication machines"—individuals who produce high-impact journal articles without possessing the deep theoretical understanding necessary for meaningful scientific contribution. This phenomenon represents a regression toward pre-scientific methodologies, where experimental observations were accumulated without the theoretical frameworks necessary for scientific comprehension.
The consequences of this theoretical illiteracy extend far beyond individual career trajectories to encompass the entire enterprise of scientific progress. Physics has experienced unprecedented stagnation for nearly half a century, not because empirical techniques have failed, but because the theoretical foundations necessary for breakthrough discoveries have been systematically neglected.
Liu, Yue, Why Has Physics Come to a Standstill? The Case of Microwave Absorption Theory and the State of Scientific Progress, 2025, yueliusd.substack.com
Modern journals publish thousands of papers containing experimental data fitted to established theories, mistaking this technical exercise for genuine scientific innovation.
The Historical Foundation: How Theoretical Understanding Drives Discovery
Newton's Era: Theoretical Literacy as Scientific Prerequisite
The Scientific Revolution succeeded precisely because its practitioners possessed comprehensive theoretical literacy. Newton's contemporaries spent years mastering mathematical principles and natural philosophy through intensive study of foundational texts before attempting original contributions. This theoretical grounding enabled them to recognize patterns and principles that escaped purely empirical observers.
The hydrogen spectrum provides an exemplary case of theoretical synthesis transforming empirical chaos into scientific knowledge. While countless researchers had observed hydrogen's spectral lines, it was theoretical understanding—specifically Rydberg's mathematical formulation and later Bohr's quantum theoretical framework—that transformed disconnected observations into coherent scientific theory. A mathematics teacher using theoretical principles accomplished what armies of experimental spectroscopists could not: the reduction of complex phenomena to elegant mathematical relationships.
This historical pattern demonstrates a crucial principle: experimental observations remain meaningless phenomenological descriptions until theoretical frameworks provide interpretive structure. The power of 18th and 19th-century science derived not from experimental sophistication but from the theoretical literacy of its practitioners.
The Degradation of Theoretical Education
Contemporary scientific education has abandoned the theoretical emphasis that characterized earlier periods of scientific productivity. Modern graduate programs prioritize experimental technique over theoretical comprehension, producing researchers who can operate sophisticated equipment but lack the theoretical understanding necessary for scientific innovation.
This educational degradation reflects a fundamental confusion about the purpose of scientific training. While earlier generations viewed scientific education as the systematic development of theoretical understanding, contemporary programs function as vocational training for experimental technicians. Graduate students spend years learning to use instruments and generate data while remaining ignorant of the theoretical principles that should guide their work.
The consequences appear clearly in published literature, where researchers demonstrate sophisticated experimental technique combined with elementary theoretical errors.
Aly, Kamal A. Comment on the relationship between electrical and optical conductivity used in several recent papers published in the journal of materials science: materials in electronics. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 2022, 33, 1960-1965. DOI: 10.1007/s10854-021-07496-9
Ying Liu, Yue Liu, Drew MGB. Review: Clarifications of concepts concerning interplanar spacing in crystals with reference to recent publications. SN Applied Sciences 2020 , 2(4) : 755.
Yue Liu, Ying Liu, Michael G. B. Drew Review: Recognizing problems in publications concerned with microwave absorption film and providing corrections A focused review, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2025, 64(7), 3635–3650, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04544
Liu Ying, Liu Yue, Drew Michael G. B. Natural mathematical derivation of the Gibbs-Duhem Equation related to ΔG and ∂G/∂ξ, International Journal of Thermophysics, 2022, 43, 73 doi: 10.1007/s10765-022-02998-y. ( Natural Mathematical Derivation of the Gibbs-Duhem Equation, 2022-03-10 | Preprint, Research Square, DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1061987/v1)
Modern papers routinely contain basic conceptual mistakes that would have been immediately recognized by theoretically literate scientists of earlier eras. The peer review system, populated by similarly theoretically illiterate reviewers, fails to identify these errors, perpetuating the degradation of scientific standards.
The Contemporary Crisis: Journal Literature as Intellectual Junk Food
The Illusion of Scientific Progress
The exponential growth in journal publications creates an illusion of scientific progress while actually impeding genuine understanding. Modern journals publish thousands of papers containing experimental data fitted to established theoretical frameworks, mistaking this mechanical exercise for scientific innovation. These publications accumulate citations not because they advance theoretical understanding, but because they provide convenient experimental validation for existing paradigms.
Liu, Yue, Self-Citation Versus External Citation in Academic Publishing: A Critical Analysis of Citation Reliability, Publication Biases, And Scientific Quality Assessment (August 14, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5392646 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5392646
The case of microwave absorption research exemplifies this pathology. Despite fundamental theoretical errors that can be identified using undergraduate-level physics principles, incorrect theories continue dominating the literature because researchers lack the theoretical literacy necessary to recognize basic mistakes. Papers supporting flawed theories accumulate citations while corrections are ignored, demonstrating how journal literature can canonize error rather than advance truth.
Liu, Yue and Liu, Ying and Drew, Michael G. B., The Fundamental Distinction Between Films and Materials: How Conceptual Confusion Led to Theoretical Errors in Microwave Absorption (September 17, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5498078 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5498078
Yue Liu，Ying Liu，Michael G. B Drew，Citation Issues in Wave Mechanics Theory of Microwave Absorption: A Comprehensive Analysis with Theoretical Foundations and Peer Review Challenges, 2025, arXiv:2508.06522v3, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.06522
This pattern extends across scientific disciplines. Research has demonstrated that non-replicable studies receive higher citation rates than studies that successfully replicate, indicating that the scientific community rewards novelty over reliability. The emphasis on journal publication has created systematic bias toward interesting but unreliable results rather than sound theoretical development.
Cargo Cult Science, From a Caltech commencement address given in 1974
“I looked up the subsequent history of this research. The next experiment, and the one after that, never referred to Mr. Young. They never used any of his criteria of putting the corridor on sand, or being very careful. They just went right on running the rats in the same old way, and paid no attention to the great discoveries of Mr. Young, and his papers are not referred to, because he didn't discover anything about the rats. In fact, he discovered all the things you have to do to discover something about rats. But not paying attention to experiments like that is a characteristic example of cargo cult science.”
The Publication Machine Phenomenon
Modern researchers have been transformed into what can accurately be characterized as "publication machines"—individuals whose primary function is generating high-impact journal articles regardless of their contribution to scientific understanding. This transformation reflects changes in academic incentive structures that reward publication quantity and citation metrics over theoretical comprehension.
These publication machines demonstrate sophisticated technical competence combined with profound theoretical ignorance. They can operate complex experimental apparatus, apply statistical methods, and produce professionally formatted manuscripts while remaining ignorant of the theoretical principles that should guide their work. Their publications receive citations and career advancement despite contributing nothing to genuine scientific understanding.
The most revealing aspect of this phenomenon is that publication machines cannot identify elementary errors in their own field's literature. Papers containing obvious theoretical mistakes pass through peer review and accumulate citations because neither authors nor reviewers possess sufficient theoretical understanding to recognize fundamental problems.
Liu, Yue, The Theoretical Poverty of Modern Academia: Evidence of Widespread Intellectual Decline in Contemporary Scientific Research (September 05, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5463155 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5463155
The Superiority of Textbooks and Monographs
Comprehensive vs. Fragmentary Knowledge
Textbooks and monographs provide comprehensive theoretical understanding that journal articles cannot match. While journal papers report narrow experimental findings within established frameworks, monographs present systematic theoretical development that enables genuine understanding of underlying principles.
The depth of treatment possible in monographs allows for complete exploration of theoretical foundations, something impossible in journal articles constrained by space limitations and reviewer expectations. Monographs can trace the historical development of ideas, examine alternative theoretical approaches, and provide the conceptual context necessary for understanding why particular theories succeeded while others failed.
Modern researchers, focused exclusively on recent journal literature, lack this historical and theoretical context. They remain ignorant of how current theories developed, what problems they were designed to solve, and what limitations they possess. This ignorance makes them incapable of genuine theoretical innovation, reducing them to technical operators within established paradigms.
The Pedagogical Function of Theoretical Texts
Textbooks serve the crucial pedagogical function of transmitting consolidated theoretical understanding across generations. Unlike journal articles, which assume extensive background knowledge and focus on narrow technical points, textbooks provide systematic introduction to theoretical principles that enable independent scientific thinking.
The systematic study of textbooks develops the theoretical literacy necessary for scientific innovation. Students who master theoretical foundations through comprehensive textbook study acquire the conceptual tools necessary for recognizing patterns, identifying errors, and developing new theoretical insights. This theoretical foundation distinguishes genuine scientists from mere technical operators.
Contemporary emphasis on journal literature disrupts this pedagogical function, producing researchers who lack theoretical foundations despite extensive familiarity with current experimental results. These researchers can recite experimental findings but cannot explain the theoretical principles that make those findings scientifically meaningful.
Monographs as Vehicles for Theoretical Innovation
Monographs provide the space and freedom necessary for developing genuinely novel theoretical perspectives. Unlike journal articles, which must conform to established paradigms to pass peer review, monographs allow authors to develop comprehensive alternative theoretical frameworks.
Historical analysis reveals that major theoretical breakthroughs typically appeared in monographic form rather than as journal articles. Darwin's Origin of Species, Einstein's popular expositions of relativity, and Newton's Principia established new theoretical frameworks through comprehensive monographic treatment that would have been impossible within journal constraints.
Modern academic culture's devaluation of monographs represents a systematic elimination of the primary vehicle for theoretical innovation. Researchers are incentivized to produce numerous brief journal articles rather than comprehensive theoretical works, ensuring that fundamental theoretical development becomes impossible.
Liu, Yue, Why Has Physics Come to a Standstill? The Case of Microwave Absorption Theory and the State of Scientific Progress, 2025, yueliusd.substack.com
The Alchemical Regression in Modern Science
Experimental Accumulation Without Theoretical Understanding
Contemporary scientific practice increasingly resembles pre-scientific alchemy in its emphasis on experimental accumulation over theoretical understanding. Modern researchers accumulate experimental observations and statistical correlations without developing the theoretical frameworks necessary for scientific comprehension.
Liu, Yue and Liu, Ying, Redefining Review Articles: Beyond Balance Toward Theoretical Innovation (September 01, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5434337 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5434337, Liu, Yue, Redefining Review Articles: Beyond Balance Toward Theoretical Innovation, Sep 01, 2025, yueliusd.substack.com
This regression appears most clearly in fields that have abandoned theoretical development in favor of data collection. Researchers assume that sufficient experimental data can substitute for theoretical understanding, despite historical evidence that theoretical frameworks are necessary for interpreting empirical observations.
The proliferation of "big data" approaches exemplifies this alchemical mentality. Researchers collect massive datasets and apply sophisticated statistical techniques without understanding the theoretical principles that should guide data interpretation. The resulting publications contain experimental observations without scientific insight.
Liu, Yue, The Misapplication of Statistical Methods in Liberal Arts: A Critical Analysis of Academic Publishing Bias Against Theoretical Research (August 01, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5376778 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5376778
The Cargo Cult Science Syndrome
Modern scientific practice exhibits what Feynman characterized as "cargo cult science"—the external forms of scientific activity without the underlying substance. Researchers follow publication protocols, conduct peer review, and accumulate citations while lacking the theoretical integrity that characterizes genuine scientific inquiry.
This cargo cult mentality appears particularly clearly in the treatment of theoretical errors. When fundamental mistakes are identified in widely accepted theories, the scientific community typically ignores the corrections rather than engaging in honest theoretical evaluation. The social and professional investment in existing paradigms outweighs commitment to theoretical accuracy.
Liu, Yue, The Theoretical Poverty of Modern Academia: Evidence of Widespread Intellectual Decline in Contemporary Scientific Research (September 05, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5463155 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5463155
Yue Liu，Ying Liu，Michael G. B Drew，Citation Issues in Wave Mechanics Theory of Microwave Absorption: A Comprehensive Analysis with Theoretical Foundations and Peer Review Challenges, 2025, arXiv:2508.06522v3, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.06522
The continued dominance of demonstrably incorrect theories in various fields indicates that the scientific community has lost the capacity for theoretical self-correction. This represents a fundamental departure from the scientific method, which depends on the willingness to abandon false theories when better alternatives become available.
Case Studies in Theoretical Illiteracy
The Microwave Absorption Controversy
The field of microwave absorption materials provides a striking example of how theoretical illiteracy perpetuates scientific error. Despite theoretical arguments that the mainstream impedance matching theory contains fundamental flaws identifiable using basic wave mechanics principles, the incorrect theory continues dominating research and publication.
…
The Carbon Journal Article Analysis
A particularly revealing example appears in a recent Carbon journal article that reportedly contains fundamental theoretical errors throughout yet has accumulated over 150 citations. Meanwhile, a correction of these errors published in another journal remains uncited, demonstrating how journal literature can canonize error while ignoring truth.
Liu, Yue, Self-Citation Versus External Citation in Academic Publishing: A Critical Analysis of Citation Reliability, Publication Biases, And Scientific Quality Assessment (August 14, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5392646 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5392646
…
The Apprenticeship Model Regression
Contemporary graduate education has abandoned systematic theoretical instruction in favor of an apprenticeship model that emphasizes technique over understanding. Graduate students learn experimental methods through hands-on training while remaining ignorant of the theoretical principles that should guide their work.
This apprenticeship approach represents a regression toward pre-scientific methodologies, where knowledge transmission occurred through master-craftsman relationships rather than through systematic theoretical education. The result is researchers who possess technical competence without theoretical understanding.
…
The Practical Education Fallacy
The contemporary emphasis on "practical education" and "experiential learning" represents a fundamental misunderstanding of how scientific knowledge is properly transmitted. Advocates of practical education argue that hands-on experience provides superior learning compared to theoretical study, but this approach produces technical operators rather than innovative scientists.
True scientific education requires systematic study of theoretical foundations before practical application. Students must master mathematical principles, understand historical development of theories, and comprehend conceptual frameworks before they can meaningfully interpret experimental results.
…
The Self-Citation Paradox: Quality vs. Conformity
Research has demonstrated that self-citations often indicate higher quality and theoretical rigor than external citations. Self-citing authors must demonstrate comprehensive understanding of their theoretical frameworks and can be held accountable for consistency across their work. External citations, by contrast, often reflect conformity to established paradigms rather than careful theoretical evaluation.
…
The Publication Bias Crisis
The Canonization of False Facts
Publication bias systematically canonizes false theories as scientific fact through selective reporting and editorial preferences. Journals preferentially publish positive results that support established theories while rejecting negative results or theoretical challenges, creating artificial consensus around potentially incorrect ideas.
Cargo Cult Science, From a Caltech commencement address given in 1974
…
The Peer Review Pathology
The peer review system has become a mechanism for enforcing theoretical orthodoxy rather than ensuring scientific quality. Reviewers, trained within established paradigms and rewarded for conformity, systematically reject papers that challenge existing theoretical frameworks regardless of their scientific merit.
…
The Mathematical Logic Foundation
Theoretical Principles as Natural Law
Correct theoretical principles possess logical necessity that transcends particular experimental confirmations. Mathematical relationships describe the fundamental logical structure of natural phenomena, providing a foundation for scientific understanding that supersedes empirical validation in individual cases.
…
The Logical Priority of Theory
Experimental observations acquire scientific meaning only through theoretical interpretation. Without theoretical frameworks, experimental results remain mere phenomenological descriptions rather than scientific knowledge. The theoretical literacy acquired through comprehensive study of foundational texts provides the interpretive framework necessary for understanding experimental observations.
…
The Economic and Social Pathology
The Funding Crisis in Theoretical Research
Current research funding systems systematically discriminate against theoretical work in favor of experimental projects with immediate practical applications
…
The Career Incentive Inversion
Modern academic career advancement rewards publication quantity and citation accumulation rather than theoretical understanding or scientific insight. Researchers optimize their behavior for metrics that measure social acceptance rather than scientific contribution.
…
The contemporary emphasis on journal literature over theoretical foundations represents a fundamental choice between scientific progress and alchemical regression. Journal articles, focused on narrow experimental findings within established paradigms, cannot provide the comprehensive theoretical understanding necessary for genuine scientific innovation.
Textbooks and monographs, by contrast, offer the systematic theoretical development that enables breakthrough discoveries and paradigm advances. The historical record demonstrates clearly that major scientific advances emerged from comprehensive theoretical understanding rather than from accumulation of experimental observations.
Modern researchers who focus exclusively on journal literature remain trapped within existing theoretical frameworks, incapable of the conceptual breakthroughs that drive scientific progress. They become publication machines producing technical variations on established themes while genuine theoretical development becomes impossible.
The restoration of scientific progress requires explicit recognition that reading textbooks and monographs is fundamentally more important than consuming journal literature. Only through comprehensive theoretical literacy can researchers acquire the conceptual tools necessary for genuine scientific innovation and the critical judgment needed to distinguish truth from error in contemporary scientific literature.
The stakes of this choice extend beyond individual career decisions to encompass the future of scientific progress itself. Unless the scientific community restores theoretical literacy through systematic study of foundational texts, contemporary science will continue its regression toward pre-scientific alchemy, accumulating experimental observations without developing genuine scientific understanding.
The choice is clear: we can continue the current emphasis on journal literature and accept continued scientific stagnation, or we can restore the primacy of theoretical understanding through comprehensive study of textbooks and monographs and resume the march of genuine scientific progress. The future of human knowledge depends on making the correct choice.